Assigning Grades, Classroom, Classroom Assessment, Education, Formative Assessment, Grades, John Wooden, Learning, Low Achieving Students, Performance-Driven Classrooms, Professional Development, Rick Stiggins, Teacher
This is the twelfth and final week of the Effective Teacher (MyGrade) GPA Exercise! The Exercise encourages classroom teachers to reflect on their classroom practices by reviewing a statement and then using an A to F grade to rate their performance. If you have not participated in previous weeks there is still an opportunity to do so through August 5, 2012—Check out the links at the bottom of this post—after completing all 12 Exercises calculate your overall GPA and compare it to all participants in the What’s Right blog post on August 6.
This week the MyGrade GPA Exercise asks teachers to reflect on whether they consistently recognize students’ strengths. Historically, teachers have encouraged unsuccessful learners to act in particular ways by using grades as a punishment tool, such as assigning zeros on incomplete work and taking points off for misbehaving in class. This does little to motivate struggling and unmotivated students to achieve or to improve their behavior. Not all students are motivated by grades, especially those who fall behind on their work and score so low that they see no way out. We’ve threatened these underachievers with grades enough to know that our punitive actions do not equate to more students succeeding.
Remember from Exercise 10 and Exercise 11 that when students receive information from a teacher about their performance, their self-worth is enhanced or challenged. Stop for a moment. Take a hard look at the consequences of our actions. Students who face struggles in life, experience constant defeat, and consequently exhibit modest if any confidence enter our doors every day. Many of these students hear us nagging them to complete their work. We threaten to assign an “F” grade. We do this “for the good of students.” But students don’t necessarily respond to our actions. Naturally, we rationalize their failure by shifting blame from us to them or better yet, their parents.
Just when we give up on students, they tease us by turning in their work. Seeing the least amount of effort from underachieving students, we assign them a positive grade on an assignment hoping this grade will motivate them to do more work. Sooner than later these students fall into the same old pattern and again receive failing grades from us. Unlike what we feel about our helping actions, students don’t feel good about the effort grade we assigned them. They realize they did not hit the achievement mark. Saying it a little differently, students received something positive from following our directions rather than achieving an academic goal.
Participate in this week’s Exercise:
Rick Stiggins shares an assessment experience chart describing what “winning” and “losing” strategies look like for students in our classrooms (Stiggins, 2007). Students on the losing side have not consistently experienced a classroom where teachers clearly communicate well-defined learning targets and use good formative assessment approaches to coach students to succeed. As teachers, our goal is to place students in winning situations where they are eager to learn, take on challenges, and own their learning. We need to enter our classrooms each day with the purpose in mind that comes from Coach John Wooden, one of the best basketball coaches and teachers of all time. To be effective teachers he tells us “we have not taught students, until they have learned” (Nater and Gallimore, 2006).
We should not judge our effectiveness by how much we teach, what we teach, and how we teach. Rather, we make a positive judgment if we have approached students every day knowing that our success depends on how well students learn. We must judge our work as teachers by viewing how well students learned, especially students who struggle the most.
Participate in this final Effective Teacher (MyGrade ) GPA Exercise and participate in the previous Exercises using the links below. Once you complete all twelve Exercises calculate your overall GPA; we will do the same using all anonymous poll responses in next Monday’s post (August 6, 2012).
Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessment through the student’s eyes. Educational Leadership, 67(8), 22-26.
Nater, S., and Gallimore, R. (2006). You Haven’t Taught Until Students Have Learned: John Wooden’s Teaching Principles and Practices. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Our mission at Studer Education is to provide students with a great place to learn, teachers with a great place to teach, and parents with confidence that their children are getting a great education. To do this we teach teachers and leaders how to get the best student learning results and create results-oriented school cultures. Visit us online at http://studereducation.com to learn more about Studer Education Teacher Development Institutes (TDIs), Leader Development Institutes (LDIs), and Evidence-Based Leadership. Studer Education is a division of Studer Group, the recipient of a 2010 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award.